Y’know how some of us keep saying the Silicon Valley agenda is not progressive and that it’s anti-copyright (think labor rights) positions are not in any way about YOU the users of its wondrous TUBES? Well, welcome to the real face of Google, which may start to look a lot more like a portrait of Grover Norquist than its progressive supporters might have hoped. Here’s an excerpt from this article at truth-out.org on Google’s funding for right wing organizations:
“Heritage Action, the tea-party styled political advocacy arm of the Heritage Foundation, is perhaps the most surprising recipient of Google’s largesse.
More than any other group working to repeal the Affordable Care Act, Heritage Action pushed for a sustained government shutdown in the fall of 2013, taking the country to the brink of a potentially catastrophic debt default.
Laying the ground for that strategy, Heritage Action held a nine-city “Defund Obamacare Town Hall Tour” in August 2013, providing a platform for Texas Senator Ted Cruz to address crowds of cheering tea party supporters.”
Google also have close links with the Tory government over here, a government that is currently engaging in a full-scale attack on the poor under the guise of ‘austerity’.
Really though, anyone who hadn’t realised that Google were ultra-right libertarians by now probably doesn’t want to know. It’s all been in the public domain for years.
It shows the nebulous nature of “progressivism” as a political force. I’m pretty sure that very few of those of us that are prepared to explicitly call ourselves socialists have been taken in by Google.
On a somewhat related note, have you been following the stories over here about Amazon and their treatment of workers?
Sam, thanks for the tip about Amazon. No, I haven’t seen but will look into that ASAP.
If pointing out Google’s involvement with right wing types makes some lefties take a second at Silicon Valley then I’m all for doing it. But I think we should keep in mind that this issue cuts across right/left lines in a lot of ways. I remember reading David Lowery and East Bay Ray talking about how the GOP’s legislators were more sympathetic to their cause than the Democrats.
I don’t think I can claim to be a right winger or a libertarian anymore but I certainly used to be. The copyright issue was one (among several) things that disillusioned me with the libertarians (or at least the “mainstream” Reason Magazine/Libertarian Party types). But not because of left wing ideals. It was because I believed the anti-copyright movement was an abandonment of capitalism. People who were die-hard true believers in the invisible hand suddenly claimed market forces were irrelevant to the production of any product that you couldn’t hold in your (not invisible) hand.
This whole debate has always seemed much more about thoughtless utopianism vs. cold reality, and both sides of the spectrum have plenty of thoughtless utopians.
And yes Amazon’s labor practices are abhorrent (<– this is the left wing me speaking.)
All good points. It’s a tricky thing, but I ultimately care more about the big picture than I do about copyright itself. Or more precisely, I care about what I perceive as larger social hazards of weakening copyright for the reasons put forth by the Googles of the world. Thus far, that industry has traded on progressive sentiments regarding free speech and enabling “the people” to speak truth to power. This is an illusion designed to shroud an agenda that, as I see it, can only consolidate real power in the hands of an even smaller group of corporate brokers than we have now. That’s not pro-capitalism unless we aim to return to the days of Carnegie and Ford and a majority population that does not share in the prosperity of its labor.
But Google are capitalism. Capitalism unfettered. Compare Google’s hostility to trade unions with Mcdonalds; there’s very little difference.
Google are merely the new face of an old capitalist maxim. Money must be free to make money.
(I’m obviously talking about actually existing capitalism, as opposed to the ideal capitalism that libertarians believe in).