Quick, name a place where you can be in business without providing basic information like your name and address. Let’s see. Criminal organizations, corrupt nations, and the Internet. In a refreshing nod at sanity, the Florida legislature has passed a bill called the “True Origins of Digital Goods Act,” which now awaits signature by Governor Scott. Basically, if a site owner intends to sell, rent, or publicly provide music as a substantial portion of the content on his website, he’s going to have to provide … wait for it … contact information! I know. Draconian, right?
Well, Google (wait, I mean The Center for Democracy and Technology) has already responded to the proposed bill by saying it will threaten the value of anonymity on the Internet. To this, any thinking person’s response ought to be, “Uh, whatever.” Because of course in a free society it’s absolutely essential that a musician, a music blogger, or a music retailer maintain his anonymity. Because, y’know those roving mobs of atonal neo-fascists, who might storm the gates or something.
I’m having a hard time tracking the Internet industry on this stuff. They want transparency, they want anonymity. They want to promote exposure, they want to promote hiding in the shadows. One might almost get the idea they’re making this stuff up as they go along.
Read OpEd by musician Monte Rosa here.
We have all heard about whitewashing, and greenwashing:
http://www.greenwashingindex.com/about-greenwashing/
well there is also Sanfranwashing. This is where tech companies use ‘rights based’ phrases in order to violate the very rights they are purporting to protect. So privacy rights only get touted when there is money to be made from there exploitation. If more money can be paid by violating the privacy of people then those rights are abrogated in the interests of a free speech right. When the ‘free speech right’ is invoked that interfers with the ‘privacy rights’ of the wealthy tech executives then teh lawyers get called in:
http://gawker.com/5475332/the-google-ceo-and-his-mistress-the-tell-all-blog
http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2010/02/google_reveals.php
Is this contact information publicly available? If not, I don’t see the issue. If it is, yeah that’s a pretty big problem. (I’m not exactly hard to track down on social media etc. But considering I’ve previously had death threats from Neonazis, I think you’ll understand why I’m not keen on having my home address there for anyone who wants it).
If actual safety is your concern, you’ll have to do a lot more to hide your information from people willing to look for it beyond whatever information is associated with a site registration. The publicly available thing is a reasonable question, but I’d reject safety concerns as a reasonable fear in this case.