Homeless in the Shadow of Google

Take a look at this story from Bill Moyers about the population of homeless in Silicon Valley. Granted there are homeless in every community, but as the segment suggests, this region can be fairly described as a microcosm of the United States where wealth consolidation and the bifurcation of society remains a growing economic cancer.  As such, it seems like a great opportunity for those atop the hill in Digitopia to show us right in their own community how their innovations might fulfill some of their more idealistic promises.  Y’know, IRL.

The one-word answer for everything the masters of Web 2.0 want to do is “innovation.” From privacy invasions to copyright infringements to just about any responsibility society might presume to place on their shoulders, the response from this industry too often echoes the Robbert Barons of another era who would say, “You can’t stop progress,” while labor was being ground beneath its wheels.  How often are we treated to up-with-people messages about global enlightenment and egalitarianism through technology?  Meanwhile, the tented societies living in the shadows of Google, Facebook, et al symbolize the reality that at least some of of this so-called innovation is cannibalizing that which already exists and monetizing ephemera, while building little more than another way to sell an ad for products that fewer and fewer people can afford.

“Heads, I win. Tails, you lose.” by Masnick

Okay, this video is three years old, but it’s still relevant because it represents a persistent, underlying faith in an “economic model” that enables even well-meaning people to think they’re doing the world a favor by pimping for the Web industry.  What Mike Masnick, editor of TechDirt, says in this video is that if your business makes a product that can be converted into a digital file — a movie, an album, a TV show — that the natural price for that product is zero.  Moreover, if you fail to understand why this a good thing, it’s because you’re “unwilling to embrace new opportunities.”  In other words, the basic premise of Investor + Producer = ROI may still apply to making iPads, but it no longer applies to the music or motion pictures that might play on them.

I know I’m not the economic futurist Masnick is, and maybe I just have a knee-jerk reaction to white boards, but if I saw this same video fifteen years ago, I’d assume it was satire.  Sadly, no. Masnick actually believes what he’s saying here, and he reflects either the belief, or at least the PR talking points, of the tech industry he represents. And when you engage a firmly-held belief in a debate on policy (let’s say regarding the digital exploitation of creators), your opponent is only pretending to talk about the details.  In a nutshell, you can’t have a debate about how to solve a problem with someone who believes the problem doesn’t exist.

UPDATE:  As if on cue, read this article by Adam Lipsius from the Huffington Post.